The Death Penalty has always been an emotionally charged issue for many people. Both sides of the coin have their merits. I don't think anyone wants to kill an innocent person by mistake. And no one wants to give a murderer another chance to kill again.
Luckily, medical technology is advancing in related areas. DNA testing has given us more accurate information - despite its lack of perfection. And executions are less gruesome than in the past. The guillotine and noose have given way to lethal injections from a sterile needle in an area numbed by local anesthetic. The crimes for which the penalty is imposed are much more brutal than the punishment.
However, there are those who still oppose the death penalty. What right does the State have to decide life and death? There are those who say it's not effective as a deterrent. And there are others who point to political and judicial corruption and shudder to think that their lives could someday lie in their hands (and in the effectiveness of a court-appointed lawyer).
On the other side lies the pain of the victim's family. Their loved one was brutally taken from them by a criminal who now has a retirement plan. Life imprisonment means three hot meals a day, a rent-free place to stay, education, counseling, medical treatment and various other "humane treatments." I have spoken to corrections officers (fellow drill sergeants) who tell of the weekly steak dinners and the "Family Day" that the prisoners are allowed. And we pay for all of it. We pay in taxes. We pay in lowered real estate prices near prisons. We pay in fear when escapes are made. And we pay when they brutally murder our loved ones to earn that retirement. It seems like Life Imprisonment means that everyone pays but the criminal.
Germany's justice ministry is reluctant to hand over original bank transfer documents allegedly linking Moussaoui to a roommate of one of the Sept. 11 hijackers because the US is seeking the death penalty for Moussaoui.
Posted by BlueWolf on June 13, 2002 12:55 PM